Saturday, November 12, 2005

Sarkozy and de Villepin a winning team for the 2007 presidential?

French interior minister Nicolas Sarkozy is trying to embody today what Le Pen (Radical Nationalist and Anti-immigrant) was for the last years.

It is a very well known fact that Sarkozy intends to run for the post of French President against his own party's Dominique de Villepin (current French prime-minister). Sarkozy's comments in which he called immigrants "scum" put him in the extreme right-wing of his own party and probably closer to Le Pen's party, Le Front National, than to his own party mentor, current President Jacques Chirac.

Why is Sarkozy trying to please the extreme right electorate?



In the last presidential election the contenders for the second round were current President Jacques Chirac and Right-wing nationalist Le Pen. Le Pen ended the second turn with 20% of the votes cast in that election. By courting the right-wing electorate with this kind of language Sarkozy is trying to assemble enough votes from the right to effectively eliminate the "Le Pen" effect, by replacing it with the "Sarkozy effect".

This is how they expect it to work: If the President's and Sarkozy's own party (UMP) can maintain their votes (~20%) and assemble some votes from the right (mostly from Le Pen), they will have effectively eliminated Le Pen's chances of reaching the second round.

At the same time they will play de Villepin as a more humanist, left-leaning candidate to steal some votes from the left. If this works they will be able to have two of their candidates (de Villepin and Sarkozy) in the second round of the election and avoid a confrontation with the left, which is gaining votes in France.

For this to succeed they have to be able to portray de Villepin as a left-leaning humanist candidate and Sarkozy as a right-leaning candidate bordering on nationalist. Later, when the elections are closer (the election will be in 2007) they will of course have to fake a big fight between Sarkozy and de Villepin, which will probably enable de Villepin to leave the government at the same time as Chirac will promote Sarkozy to prime-minister. De Villepin will then start his own presidential campaign by saying: "I am left wing! Look at what the President did, he fired me and promoted a right-wing radical to prime-minister!".

This will give both de Villepin and Sarkozy an alibi to start their separate presidential campaigns and together try to get enough votes to prevent a left-wing candidate to reach the second turn.

All in all it is a good strategy that could easily work if the left in France is not capable of occupying the space that de Villepin will certainly try to fill.

Watch out for de Villepin or Sarkozy starting their own "party" for the presidential election!


Why did the violence start in Clichy sous Bois in October 27th?



RIGHTS-FRANCE: Where Immigrants are 'Scum': "The violence broke out after three children died of electrocution in a high-voltage electricity utility in Clichy sous Bois Oct. 27. Minister for the interior Nicolas Sarkozy first said the children were fleeing after a burglary, but the justice department later denied that any crime had taken place.

'The teenagers were fleeing apparently because they thought the police were following them, which was not the case,' a spokesperson at the justice department said.

Hundreds of residents of Clichy sous Bois demonstrated in protest. Later, youth gangs set automobiles, stores, and even school buildings on fire. They attacked the police with stones and at places also fired at them.

A statement by Sarkozy that people resorting to violence in the low-income districts surrounding Paris were 'racaille' meaning 'rabble' or 'scum', inflamed the already explosive situation. These areas are mostly inhabited by immigrants.

Sarkozy said he will clean these areas with a 'Kaercher' (high-pressure cleansing machinery mostly used in industry). "

Saturday, November 05, 2005

Re-writing history

A funny thing happened in my corner of the world lately.

Finland will have a presidential election in January 2006. The funny thing is that the right-wing conservative presidential candidate in a campaign starting event declared himself to be in defence of the "workers", which he classified as all people (including multimillionary CEO's that make more money when they fire the "other" workers [Helsingin Sanomat, 27/10/2005, 4/11/2005]).

This being the beggining of the campaign you can expect the candidates to still be trying to get the "hang" of the themes that will shape the campaign, on the other hand what the right-wing candidate is trying to do is pretty unheard of.

I mean we do have guys like Blair and Schröeder coming from the left and trying to go more to the center in order to get more right-wing votes, but this is the first time that hear of a right-wing candidate trying to get more votes from the hard-core left!

Why this happened we can only speculate, but one reason may be that because Tarja Halonen (the incumbent with about 58% vote intentions in the latest poll) is a person that has the trust of the left and pretty much of the center the only option to avoid Tarja's victory is to hijack her campaign themes.

By hijacking the campaign theme of "defending workers" the right-wing candidate tries to set himself apart from the third candidate (Center-right and current prime minister) and sets his only opponent to be the incumbent president.

As far as political strategies go this is not too difficult to follow. But the amazing circumstance - and harder to explain - is that he is trying to re-write history by turning Marx's theory on it's head.

Marx stated:
- there is a class strugle
- history is played out as a class strugle of those that don't have the wealth trying to obtain the wealth that has been "abused" by the rulling classes and the Bourgois at that time.

What our right-wing candidate is trying to say is:
- there is no class strugle
- history is not played as a class strugle because there are no classes anymore.

Of course there will not be many Doctoral thesis written on this subject, but the fact that a political candidate is trying to turn history on it's head to win a presidential election begs the question: Why is he doing this?

Can it be only to win an election (in which case he would forget about this outrageous claim after the election and go about his business).
Can it be a more profound reason: like really tring to hijack the political space on the center-left?

Beats me, but one thing is for sure: Marx must be turning in his grave (as so will the dead right-wing politicians in this small country called Finland! :)

(c) All rights reserved